Public sites analyzed by the same review anyone can run: government portals, newsrooms, banks, universities, open-source projects, and transit systems. Open a report to see the scores, what to fix first, and what already works. Reviews people request are added in a daily batch. View and share only.
You sign in on the device you run it from, with email or an account you already have (Google, Microsoft, GitHub, Yahoo, or X). QA-lab URL Review then fetches a public https address, describes the response, and proposes test cases. It does not run those cases, sign in to your site, submit forms, or generate load.
Sign in
You sign in on the device that runs the review, with email (a 6-digit code or a link, valid for 15 minutes on the same device) or an account you already have: Google, Microsoft, GitHub, Yahoo, or X. Your email comes from that sign-in. Signed-in runs are listed on your account page.
What the report scores
Six areas from 0 to 100: SEO, GEO (whether AI search and answer engines can read and cite the site), analytics, security, accessibility, and performance. Each check is marked fails now, at risk, passes, or needs a person, with the evidence, a fix, and an effort estimate. You also see how the site looks in a Google result and a shared link, which AI crawlers its robots.txt lets in, a map of the pages analyzed, and what to fix first. A headless browser loads up to three pages from an EU address in Belgium: it records tracking before and after a cookie choice, runs axe-core, compares the HTML text with the rendered page, checks phone and tablet widths, and keeps three screenshots. It also checks chat widgets and AI chatbots (consent, weight, and keyboard access), the accessibility statement, imprint, and privacy pages, outdated front-end libraries, Google Safe Browsing through Web Risk, domain expiry and transfer lock through RDAP, and MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI for mail, and estimates the carbon of one visit. A site whose bot protection refuses the plain request is analyzed in headless Chrome.
Frameworks and tools
Playwright, Cypress, Robot, Selenium, WebdriverIO, CodeceptJS, Selenide, TestNG, Watir, Cucumber, Behave, Reqnroll, Jest, Vitest, Mocha, Appium, Maestro, JMeter, Gatling, and k6 are the frameworks. axe-core runs in the review's headless browser on up to three pages, and Lighthouse runs on the start page through Google PageSpeed Insights. BrowserStack, Applitools, Percy, Provar, and Copado are named when they apply and are not launched against your site.
Automation scripts
It proposes test cases from one public https address and writes each one for the frameworks your team uses, from Playwright and Cypress to Selenide, Cucumber, Jest, Appium, and k6. The case export includes a starting script per framework and a ZIP with one suite each, a GitHub Actions workflow that runs them, and a fix kit with header files for common hosts, a Report-Only content security policy, and drafts for structured data, llms.txt, security.txt, and DNS records. The scripts are yours to run; the review never runs them.
Your site
It only analyzes public pages. It does not sign in to your site, submit forms, or generate load, and it does not run the cases it proposes.
How far it goes
Your first review is included: up to twenty pages, two links deep. Want a wider or deeper look? You see the price before anything starts.
Where cases go
Automation scripts as a ZIP, Excel, TestRail, Xray, Zephyr Scale, Jira, Azure Test Plans, MantisBT, JSON, plain text, or PDF. Every format carries the scripts for your frameworks. Case export is priced on the page.
Language
The page is written in English and can be read in Spanish, Portuguese, German, French, and Italian. The news strip follows the country of the connection and the language of the page.
Rules
A review analyzes a public page, tells you what it found, and suggests test cases your team can use. The disclaimers explain how that works, including what applies in the country of the site you are reviewing.
Lines appear here while the pages are being analyzed. Stop keeps the pages already saved and writes that stop into the report.
This sheet does not include the report. The attempt is recorded with the review.
Run dashboard
Report
This link opens in full only for you, signed in. Anyone else sees a blurred preview.
This report was generated with QA-lab URL Review by Carlos Muñoz (https://carlosandmunoz.com).
One-page summary
Next to a competitor
Run the same review on a competitor's site and see who wins each indicator: the six areas as a radar and 3D columns, speed and page weight head to head, your advantages and theirs, the common ground, the open problems only one site has, and how present each site is in the market, from its Tranco rank and 30-day trend.
https://
Tem o preço de uma segunda revisão. O desconto de retorno vale quando você compara pelo dispositivo que fez esta revisão. O site do concorrente recebe só as verificações públicas e passivas: sem conversa com o chat e sem envio de formulários. Como em qualquer revisão, o dono pode receber um e-mail sobre ela, e as pontuações podem aparecer nos Live Reports.
Health score
Fix first
In a real browser
How it looks in Google and when shared
What AI sees
Analytics and consent
Search visibility
Map of the pages analyzed
Security and email
Every check, with its verdict
Fix kit
Proposed cases by layer
Technologies seen
Tools that apply
Checked tools join the frameworks on the payment schedule. The amount is shown when you pay. axe-core already ran in the review's headless browser. Checking it adds its checks to your scripts. The other tools are not launched.
Alarm
What the public response left in the open
Signed-in run
A login you are allowed to use
This page does not take the password. The signed-in run waits until it is paid.
Public write-ups
What the response showed
Pages analyzed
Path
Status
ms
Title
Review log kept with this run
Cases that could be run
Test cases
Take this list with you
These cases can travel as a file for Jira, Xray, Zephyr, TestRail, Azure Test Plans, Mantis, Excel, JSON, or text, and they can be printed. Each case carries a starting script for the frameworks you chose, and a ZIP holds one suite per framework. Choose the kinds you want in the file. The amount is shown when you pay, and only then.
Paid export
Choose a file
Every file carries this report’s signature, so the list can be recognized as a QA-lab URL Review.
Report file
This report was already shown
—
The amount for seeing, downloading, or printing this report again, on the account that ran it, is shown here.